One of my favorite thinkers of the 20th century, Terence McKenna, said that the world is similar to a novel, and that problem most people have in navigating their life is that they think the point of life is to become the main character of the novel. McKenna says that this is the incorrect attitude to have towards life, and that one must become the author of the novel of their life, not a main character. I think this is a good analogy to make sense of Sartre’s ‘Bad Faith.’
If one lives as if they are a character in a script, they are playing a role that is prescribed for them, and they are pretending that they don’t have the freedom to create a new script. If, on the other hand, one lives as if they are the author of the script of life, you are free to create your life as you see fit, rather than imagine that you have to play some role drawn out by someone else.
This analogy is easy to understand from Sartre’s example of the waiter. In his example, the waiter is performing the role of the waiter as if it something other than himself, like an automaton that has been programmed to act in a certain way. In this sense, he is playing a character that he believes has already been prescribed and that he must play the part of. He believes he has no choice. However, as Sartre pointed out, his decision to accept the prescribed role of the waiter is a choice that he is making freely. It is entirely within his power at every single moment to play a different role, and author a new script for himself. His rigid display of the waiter’s behavior, alludes to the fact that the waiter is subtly aware of this distinction, and that he is denying his ability to freely make the choice that he really desires to make. Or, as McKenna might have put it, the waiter is denying his freedom to create his own story by choosing to accept a story written by someone else.
I recently read an article written by a nurse that specializes in palliative care. In the article she expounded on five common things dying people had regrets about. One of most common regrets was that the dying wished they had lived the life they wanted to live, rather than the one someone else wanted them to live. I think this is important, and supports both Sartre’s and McKenna’s idea that we must take more responsibility in the direction of our lives, and resist the temptation to take an easier path that has already been laid out by someone else. It is quite telling that many people regret not asserting their ‘dasein’ upon the world, and timidly accepting a life that their parents, friends, lover or society feels that they should have lived.
Anecdotally, I have had similar experiences. As I’ve lived out my 31 years on this planet, I’ve been most happy when I’ve been doing the things I wanted to do, rather than doing the things that my parents felt I should be doing, or the things that society has told me is important in leading a good life. This wisdom is found throughout others thoughts and writings, as in Robert Frosts’ ‘The Road not Taken’:
“I shall be telling this with a sigh
Somewhere ages and ages hence:
Two roads diverged in a wood, and I—
I took the one less traveled by,
And that has made all the difference.”
Therefore, in order to avoid one of the common regrets people have at their deathbed, it is important for us to examine our paths in life, and choose the one less traveled, rather than the one that everyone else has been following blindly because that is what everyone else is doing. All you are doing in that case is following the path of least resistance, and all of us already know where those paths lead. We must forge new paths in order to discover something new about ourselves and the world we inhabit.